Legal Opinion

Hutter v. City of Wickliffe

Lake County Court of Common Pleas

Decided June 3, 1983No. 82 CIV 1285PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMitrovich, J.

This cause came on for consideration by the court on May 11, 1983, the court having heretofore ordered the city of Wickliffe to show cause why the property of plaintiff ought not to be returned to him. The defendant responds by brief and affidavit, representing that R.C. 4549.07 makes knowing possession of a vehicle with altered serial numbers unlawful. R.C. 2933.41, defendant points out, causes the loss of plaintiff’s property rights.

On first blush, the difficulty presented in disposing of this case is that R.C. 4549.07 requires that the element of “knowingly” be proved. “Knowingly” means…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Bernad v. City of LakewoodOhio Court of Appeals · 2000
  2. In Re Forfeiture of 1980 Fruehauf Forty-Foot Flatbed TrailerOhio Court of Appeals · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API