Legal Opinion

Kenneth Ray Griffin v. Tim West and the Attorney General of Oklahoma

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided June 3, 1986No. 84-2542PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SETH, Circuit Judge.

After examining the briefs and the appellate record, this three-judge panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not be of material assistance in the determination of this appeal. See Fed.R. App.P. 34(a); Tenth Cir.R. 10(e). The cause is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.

Asserting that he was denied effective assistance of counsel in his state conviction for unlawful possession of a firearm, Kenneth Ray Griffin appeals the United States District Court's order denying his petition for a writ of habeas corpus. Although Mr. Griffin may have a…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  5. Cuyler v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1980

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Penson v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. Laville Hannon v. Herb Maschner and Attorney General of the State of Kansas, RespondentsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988
  3. Young v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1995
  4. Penson v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  5. Kennedy v. ShillingerDistrict Court, D. Wyoming · 1991

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API