State v. Brinker
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMitchell, J.
The Poultry Fertilizer Company, a corporation, instituted an action in the superior court for King county on October 15, 1923, to recover judgment on an account against G. Nakazawa and I. Yoshi-mine, partners. The case was tried without a jury, and on March 24,1924, findings were made and entered to the effect that the plaintiff had sold and delivered to the defendants fertilizer at the agreed price of $842.92, on which only $140 had been paid; that, on commencing the action, a writ of attachment was issued out of the superior court, pursuant to which the sheriff on the same day, October 15,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Bierer v. BlurockWashington Supreme Court · 1894
- Hamilton Brown Shoe Co. v. AdamsWashington Supreme Court · 1892
- Miner v. Goodyear India-Rubber Glove Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1892
- Cosh-Murray Co. v. BothellWashington Supreme Court · 1894
- Vermont Marble Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.