Legal Opinion

Cosh-Murray Co. v. Bothell

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 17, 1894No. 1511PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from Superior Court, King County.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Stiles, J.

The appellants, George and John Bothell, were partners under the firm name of Bothell Bros., and found it *315necessary to make an assignment of their property for the benefit of their creditors. The respondent presented its claim to the assignee, but the appellants protested against its allowance, in whole or in part. Whereupon the respondent withdrew its claim and brought suit, upon which it obtained a judgment.

One of the defenses to the action was the insolvency of the appellants’ firm, which was pleaded as a bar to the action. We are of the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Limbocker v. HiginbothamSupreme Court of Kansas · 1894
  2. Lawrence v. McVeaghIndiana Supreme Court · 1886

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Boston National Bank v. HammondWashington Supreme Court · 1899
  2. Thompson v. SinesWashington Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Seattle Cabinet Works v. Nordby Hat ShopsWashington Supreme Court · 1926
  4. State ex rel. Smith v. CliffordWashington Supreme Court · 1922
  5. State v. BrinkerWashington Supreme Court · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API