Legal Opinion

Hamilton Brown Shoe Co. v. Adams

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 7, 1892No. 617PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Appeal from Superior Cou/rt, Lewis County.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Dunbar, J.

On the 2d day of November, 1891, the re-

spondents executed a deed of assignment, purporting to be for the benefit of all their creditors, appointed J. H. Mallory assignee, and on the same day placed him in possession. On the 11th day of November, L891, the appellant, schedule creditor, commenced an action against respondents, J. A. Adams, A. E. Hart and G. L. Hart, alleging the assignment; alleging the indebtedness, which is not disputed; alleging the fraud of the assignment and the fraudulent transfer by the assignors of certain real estate…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Wagner v. LawWashington Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Lord v. MeachemSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1884
  3. Second National Bank v. SchranckSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1890

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. McAvoy v. JenningsWashington Supreme Court · 1906
  2. State ex rel. Enderlin State Bank v. RoseNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Crandall v. LeeWashington Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Thompson v. SinesWashington Supreme Court · 1897
  5. Konnerup v. MilspaughWashington Supreme Court · 1912

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API