Legal Opinion

Riback Enterprises, Inc. v. George Denham

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided November 26, 1971No. 277, Docket 71-1711PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FEINBERG, Circuit Judge:

In early 1970, plaintiff Riback Enterprises, Inc. engaged defendant George Denham to sell its greeting cards in three eastern states, in part of a fourth and in Washington, D.C. Denham’s job was to solicit orders directly from retailers and he was paid solely by commission. There was no written agreement between the parties. Apparently Den-ham also sold his own stationery products and those of other manufacturers, including greeting cards. At the time, Riback had been selling greeting cards called “Grinlets” for about two years. Riback describes Grinlets as “greeting…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Stiffel Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Kellogg Co. v. National Biscuit Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. Compco Corp. v. Day-Brite Lighting, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1964
  4. Hercules Packing Corp. v. SteinbrucknerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1967
  5. Hercules Packing Corp. v. SteinbrucknerNew York Court of Appeals · 1967

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Bose Corporation v. Linear Design Labs, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1972
  2. Decorative Aides Corp. v. Staple Sewing Aides Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1980
  3. T.A. Pelsue Co. v. Grand Enterprises, Inc.District Court, D. Colorado · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API