TATIS v. State
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
BENHAM, Justice.
We granted the interlocutory application of Brian Tatis to review the trial court’s denial of a motion for bond Tatis filed pursuant to OCGA § 17-7-50. The statute provides that
[a]ny person who is arrested for a crime and who is refused bail shall, within 90 days after the date of confinement, be entitled to have the charge against him or her heard by a grand jury having jurisdiction over the accused person. . . . In the event no grand jury considers the charges against the accused person within the 90 day period of confinement . . ., the accused shall have bail set upon…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Chase v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2009
- State v. EnglishSupreme Court of Georgia · 2003
- State v. NagleOhio Supreme Court · 1986
- People v. GravlinMichigan Court of Appeals · 1974
- Brown v. CrawfordSupreme Court of Georgia · 2011
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Gay v. OwensSupreme Court of Georgia · 2013
- State v. ColemanSupreme Court of Georgia · 2019
- Boyd v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2012
- Dunn v. DavidsonDistrict Court, S.D. Georgia · 2025