Legal Opinion

TATIS v. State

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided October 3, 2011No. S11A1540PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BENHAM, Justice.

We granted the interlocutory application of Brian Tatis to review the trial court’s denial of a motion for bond Tatis filed pursuant to OCGA § 17-7-50. The statute provides that

[a]ny person who is arrested for a crime and who is refused bail shall, within 90 days after the date of confinement, be entitled to have the charge against him or her heard by a grand jury having jurisdiction over the accused person. . . . In the event no grand jury considers the charges against the accused person within the 90 day period of confinement . . ., the accused shall have bail set upon…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Chase v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2009
  2. State v. EnglishSupreme Court of Georgia · 2003
  3. State v. NagleOhio Supreme Court · 1986
  4. People v. GravlinMichigan Court of Appeals · 1974
  5. Brown v. CrawfordSupreme Court of Georgia · 2011

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Gay v. OwensSupreme Court of Georgia · 2013
  2. State v. ColemanSupreme Court of Georgia · 2019
  3. Boyd v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2012
  4. Dunn v. DavidsonDistrict Court, S.D. Georgia · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API