Boyd v. State

DOYLE, Presiding Judge.

Following a bench trial, Toddric Jamel Boyd appeals from his conviction of contributing to the delinquency of a minor while drinking beer with a 16-year-old friend in a park. Boyd contends that there was insufficient evidence to support the guilty verdict, both as to the offense itself and as to venue. For the reasons that follow, we affirm.

When an appellate court reviews the sufficiency of the evidence,

the relevant question is whether, after viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, any rational trier of fact could have found the essential…