Legal Opinion

State v. Nagle

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided April 30, 1986No. 85-894PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLocher, J.

In this case, one of first impression in this state, we are called upon to determine whether appellee has a right to credit for time spent in a rehabilitation center. For the reasons to follow, we hold no such right exists and reverse the court of appeals on this issue.

I

Under Ohio law no statutory requirement is given the courts to credit time spent in a rehabilitation facility prior to commencement of sentence. While some states, such as California, expressly provide that time spent in a rehabilitation center be credited prior to commencement of sentence (see Cal. Penal Code Section 2900.5),…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Lock v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1980
  2. James John Makal v. State of Arizona and Harold G. Cardwell, Superintendent, Arizona State PrisonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976
  3. People v. RodgersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
  4. People v. StangeMichigan Court of Appeals · 1979
  5. State v. BabcockSupreme Court of Kansas · 1979

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Maus v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1987
  2. People v. WhitesideMichigan Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Beecroft v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1994
  4. State v. BlankenshipOhio Court of Appeals · 2011
  5. State v. FillingerOhio Court of Appeals · 2016

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API