State v. Nagle
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtLocher, J.
In this case, one of first impression in this state, we are called upon to determine whether appellee has a right to credit for time spent in a rehabilitation center. For the reasons to follow, we hold no such right exists and reverse the court of appeals on this issue.
I
Under Ohio law no statutory requirement is given the courts to credit time spent in a rehabilitation facility prior to commencement of sentence. While some states, such as California, expressly provide that time spent in a rehabilitation center be credited prior to commencement of sentence (see Cal. Penal Code Section 2900.5),…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Lock v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1980
- James John Makal v. State of Arizona and Harold G. Cardwell, Superintendent, Arizona State PrisonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976
- People v. RodgersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
- People v. StangeMichigan Court of Appeals · 1979
- State v. BabcockSupreme Court of Kansas · 1979
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Maus v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1987
- People v. WhitesideMichigan Supreme Court · 1991
- Beecroft v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1994
- State v. BlankenshipOhio Court of Appeals · 2011
- State v. FillingerOhio Court of Appeals · 2016
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.