Legal Opinion

Hughes v. Crean

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided November 29, 1929No. 27,617PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

Suit on a $50 promissory note, executed by defendant and another, and the defense by the guardian duly appointed and qualified that at the time the note was signed by the ward, this defendant, she was insane and unable .to transact. any business. The court found “that at the time of the execution of said note the said Lucy Crean was insane and of unsound mind and incompetent and inr capable of transacting ordinary business.” After the findings plaintiff moved for amended .findings or a new trial, and appeals from the order denying the motion.

An examination of the record satisfies us that- the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hull v. LouthIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  2. Wirebach's v. First National BankSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1881
  3. Jordan v. KirkpatrickIllinois Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Van Patton v. BealsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1877
  5. Czyrson v. Roseau County National BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1927

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Garberg v. County of HennepinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API