Legal Opinion

Garberg v. County of Hennepin

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided November 10, 1972No. 43364PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MacLaughlin, Justice.

The issue on this appeal is whether an action against a municipality for wrongful death must be commenced within 1 year after notice, which is the limitation period provided in the notieeof-claim statute, Minn. St. 466.05, subd. 1, or within 3 years after the act or omission, which is the limitation period provided in the death-by-wrongful-act statute, § 573.02. The trial court ruled that § 573.02 applies and denied defendant’s motion for summary judgment. The trial court also certified that the question is important and doubtful, and defendant appeals pursuant to §…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In Re Estate of CravensSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1929
  2. Kuhlman v. City of Fergus FallsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1929
  3. Hughes v. CreanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1929

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Federated Mutual Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1991
  2. Anderson v. Federated Mutual Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1991
  3. Pickard Motor Co., a Minnesota Corporation v. Chrysler Motors Corporation, a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API