Legal Opinion

White v. TK Elevator Corporation

District Court, D. Nevada

Decided September 28, 2024No. 2:21-cv-01696Unknown

1Opinion

1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 3 Nathan White, Case No. 2:21-cv-01696-ART-MDC 4 Plaintiff, ORDER v. 5 [ECF Nos. 52, 70, 73] TK Elevator Corporation, 6 Defendant. 7 8 This order addresses Plaintiff’s motion to strike based on spoliation of 9 evidence (ECF No. 52) and Magistrate Judge Couvillier’s report and 10 recommendation (“R&R”) that the motion be granted in part and that the Court 11 issue a rebuttable presumption instruction to the jury. (ECF No. 70.) Having 12 considered Defendant’s objections to the R&R (ECF No. 73) and Plaintiff’s 13 response (ECF No. 74), the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Mauricio A. Leon, M.D. v. Idx Systems Corporation, a Vermont Corporation, Mauricio A. Leon, M.D. v. Idx Systems Corporation, a Vermont CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
  2. Residential Funding Corporation v. Degeorge Financial Corp., Degeorge Home Alliance, Inc. And Degeorge Capital CorpCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
  3. In Re Napster, Inc. Copyright LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2006
  4. Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co.District Court, N.D. California · 2012
  5. Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co.District Court, N.D. California · 2012

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API