Legal Opinion

Chessman v. Teets

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided June 10, 1957No. 893PublishedCited by 170 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Harlan

Our writ of certiorari in this case was limited to the following question:

“whether, in the circumstances of this case, the state court proceedings to settle the trial transcript, upon which petitioner’s automatic appeal from his conviction was necessarily heard by the Supreme Court of the State of California, in which trial court proceedings petitioner allegedly was not represented in person or by counsel designated by the state court in his behalf, resulted in denying petitioner due process of law, within the meaning of the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States.” 353…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Powell v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  3. Snyder v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  4. Brown v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  5. Mooney v. HolohanSupreme Court of the United States · 1935

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by170 opinions

  1. Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Irvin v. DowdSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  3. Boumediene v. BushSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
  4. United States v. KrasSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. Routier v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2003

165 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API