Legal Opinion
In re Tax Foreclosure Action No. 34
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided March 29, 1993PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—In an in rem tax foreclosure action, the appeal is from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Jackson, J.), dated November 30, 1990, which denied the appellant’s motion to vacate so much of a second partial judgment of foreclosure, entered July 2, 1986, as, upon his default in appearing, is against a parcel of real property formerly owned by him.
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
Contrary to the appellant’s contention, the record fails to substantiate his claim that he was not served with notice of the foreclosure action. Rather, the affidavit of mailing and the mailing…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- ISCA Enterprises v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1991
- In re Tax Foreclosure No. 35Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
- City of Yonkers v. G.H. Clark & Son, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- In re Tax Foreclosure Action No. 33Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
- Lily Pond Enterprises, Inc. v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
3Cited by2 opinions
- In Rem Tax Foreclosure Action No. 47Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- 114 Aldrich, Inc. v. City of BuffaloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995