Claim of Meszaros v. Goldman
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtDesmond, J.
The question of law common to both these appeals is this: when a worker suffers two or more separate accidental injuries with resulting “ temporary partial ” disabilities, both compensable under the Workmen’s Compensation Law, and the board finds that the ultimate disability was caused in part by one or more of the earlier accidents, but the earnings of the claimant, after, and as decreased by, the latest accident, are nonetheless higher than they were at the time of the earlier contributing accident or accidents, is the latest award to be paid by the employer and carrier as of the time of…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Claim of Anderson v. Babcock & Wilcox Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1931
- Claim of Kaminsky v. Socony-Vacuum Oil Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1950
3Cited by19 opinions
- Royal Globe Insurance v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
- Marsolek v. Miller Waste MillsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
- Haverland v. Twin City Milk Producers Ass'nSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1966
- Quinn v. Automatic Sprinkler Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1958
- Johnson v. SD Warren, Div. of Scott PaperSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1981
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.