Legal Opinion

O’connell v. Director of Elections

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided June 23, 2016No. Docket 332132PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Per curiam

Plaintiff appeals as of right the Court of Claims order dismissing his mandamus complaint for want of subject-matter jurisdiction. We reverse and remand for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

I. FACTUAL BACKGROUND

The underlying facts are undisputed and are largely a matter of public record. In November 2012, plaintiff was reelected to serve a six-year term as a judge on the Court of Appeals in the fourth district. The term of office to which plaintiff was reelected will expire January 1, 2019. However, because plaintiff will have attained the age of 70 before the general…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Wayne County v. HathcockMichigan Supreme Court · 2004
  2. In re SandersMichigan Supreme Court · 2014
  3. Manuel v. GillMichigan Supreme Court · 2008
  4. Ter Beek v. City of WyomingMichigan Supreme Court · 2014
  5. Epps v. 4 Quarters Restoration LLCMichigan Supreme Court · 2015

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Citizens Protecting Michigan's Constitution v. Secretary of StateMichigan Court of Appeals · 2018
  2. Prime Time International Distributing Inc v. Dept of TreasuryMichigan Court of Appeals · 2017
  3. Beatrice Boler v. GovernorMichigan Court of Appeals · 2018
  4. Glenn Bowles v. Gretchen WhitmerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2024
  5. Meredith Summer v. Southfield Board of EducationMichigan Court of Appeals · 2018

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API