Legal Opinion
Beatrice Boler v. Governor
Michigan Court of Appeals
Decided June 14, 2018No. 337383PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Per curiam
*289 *617 Defendants Dayne Walling, Howard Croft, Michael Glasgow, Daugherty Johnson III, and the city of Flint (defendants) 1 appeal as of right the trial court's sua sponte order dismissing plaintiffs' claims against them for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction. We affirm.
Plaintiffs, residents of and a company located in the city of Flint, filed this lawsuit in June 2016 (purportedly as a class action) against the city, various officers and employees of the city, former emergency managers of the city, the Governor, the state of Michigan, the Michigan Department of Environmental Quality (MDEQ), and…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Manuel v. GillMichigan Supreme Court · 2008
- Associated Builders and Contractors v. City of LansingMichigan Supreme Court · 2016
- City of Detroit v. CoreyMichigan Supreme Court · 1861
- Anzaldua v. Neogen Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 2011
- Canavan v. . City of MechanicvilleNew York Court of Appeals · 1920
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Shari Guertin v. State of Mich.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2019
- Beatrice Boler v. GovernorMichigan Supreme Court · 2019
- Beatrice Boler v. GovernorMichigan Supreme Court · 2019
- William Beaumont Hospital v. Certificate of Need CommissionMichigan Court of Appeals · 2021
- Zachary Allen Kott-Millard v. Geoffrey FiegerMichigan Court of Appeals · 2019