Legal Opinion
Gulf Oil Corporation v. the Socony No. 16
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided July 1, 1947No. 247, Docket 20570PublishedCited by 40 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CHASE, Circuit Judge.
The libellant’s barge .Susquehanna, then being towed b> the tug Rowen Card, was struck and damaged by the appellant’s tug Socony No. 16 in the Arthur Kill early in the morning of December 14, 1945. The libellant sued the owner of the Socony No. 16 in the District Court for the Eastern District, of New York and the latter im-pleaded the owner of the Rowen Card. From an interlocutory decree holding the Socony No. 16 solely at fault for the collision, that tug’s owner has appealed.
The facts were found by the trial judge on the substantial evidence to support the findings, we…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- The PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
- The MadisonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1918
- Martin Marine Transp. Co. v. Jakobson & Peterson, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1943
- The Transfer No. 18Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1934
- National Motorship Corp. v. Pennsylvania R.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1947
3Cited by40 opinions
- Anthony v. International Paper Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1961
- Kevin Lovuolo and Antonio Musto v. John Gunning and Elaine GunningCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1991
- Ulster Oil Transport Corp. v. the Matton No. 20. the Petroleum No. 7. the CaruticaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1954
- Merritt-Chapman & Scott Corporation v. Cornell Steamship Company, of the Tug, LionCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1959
- Rice v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1948
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.