Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Raviotta

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided June 7, 2002No. Record 012009PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Lacy

In this appeal from an adverse judgment in a medical malpractice case, Oscar Johnson, administrator of the estate of Cynthia Y. Bell, claims that certain evidence did not meet the corroboration requirements of Code § 8.01-397 as a matter of law and, therefore, the trial court erred in instructing the jury on corroboration and in allowing the jury to consider such evidence.

I. FACTS

Dr. Joseph John Raviotta provided prenatal care to Cynthia Y. Bell in the summer and fall of 1997. On November 9, 1997, Ms. Bell, then 30 weeks pregnant, arrived at the emergency room of Community Memorial…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Morgen Industries, Inc. v. VaughanSupreme Court of Virginia · 1996
  2. Miller v. QuarlesSupreme Court of Virginia · 1991
  3. Reid v. BaumgardnerSupreme Court of Virginia · 1977
  4. Arwood v. Hill's AdministratorSupreme Court of Virginia · 1923
  5. Brooks v. WorthingtonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1965

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Riner v. Com.Supreme Court of Virginia · 2004
  2. Nusbaum v. BerlinSupreme Court of Virginia · 2007
  3. Scialdone v. Com.Supreme Court of Virginia · 2010
  4. Monahan v. Obici Medical Management Services, Inc.Supreme Court of Virginia · 2006
  5. Graham v. CookSupreme Court of Virginia · 2009

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API