Legal Opinion

Williamson v. Clark

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided February 13, 1931PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThompson, J.

The plaintiff seeks to recover damages for injuries he received when the Oakland touring car he was driving collided with the defendant’s truck on South Main Street in the city of Barre on September 9, 1929. At the close of the plaintiff’s evidence the court directed a verdict for the defendant. The plaintiff excepted.

There is very little dispute, if any, as to the facts of the case. In the vicinity of the place of collision South Main Street is twenty-seven feet and two inches wide and has a cement sur face with cement curbings on each side. The street runs northerly and southerly. There is…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Higgins, Admr. v. MetzgerSupreme Court of Vermont · 1928
  2. Gornstein v. PriverCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
  3. Reardon v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1923
  4. Burke v. CookMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1923
  5. Houston v. Brush & CurtisSupreme Court of Vermont · 1894

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Weeks v. BurnorSupreme Court of Vermont · 1974
  2. Hall v. RoyceSupreme Court of Vermont · 1937
  3. Gould v. GouldSupreme Court of Vermont · 1939
  4. Larmay v. VanEttenSupreme Court of Vermont · 1971
  5. Verchereau v. JamesonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1961

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API