Legal Opinion

Tulchin v. Perey Mfg. Co.

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided January 4, 1937No. 126PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CHASE, Circuit Judge.

The plaintiff is the patentee to_ whom-patent No. 1,726,779 for a turnstile was. issued September 3, 1929, and reissued to-him on September 29, 1931, in reissue patent No. 18,211. He sued on claims including 24 to 27, inclusive, of the reissue,, which were the new claims so secured ■ and the only ones actually relied on.

They read:

“24. A turnstile including a head, barrier arms extending outward from and to-one side of the face of said head, means retaining said barrier arms in planes that include the axis of said head and with equal angular intervals between them, and-an…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Seymour v. OsborneSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
  2. Topliff v. TopliffSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  3. Miller v. Brass Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1882
  4. Mahn v. HarwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  5. Carson v. American Smelting & Refining Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1925

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Monogram Mfg. Co. v. Glemby Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1943
  2. White v. Fafnir Bearing CompanyDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1966
  3. Stanley Works v. C. S. Mersick Co.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1940
  4. Pittsburgh-Erie Saw Corp. v. Southern Saw Service, Inc.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 1955
  5. Hollywood Comb Curler, Inc. v. Glemby Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API