Legal Opinion

O'Dazier v. U.S. Steel, Fairfield Works

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Decided July 22, 1994No. AV93000298PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROBERTSON, Presiding Judge.

This is a workmen’s compensation ease.

On February 7, 1992, Walter J. O’Dazier filed a complaint in the Jefferson County Circuit Court, seeking workmen’s compensation benefits from his employer U.S. Steel, Fairfield Works (USX). O’Dazier alleged that on March 2, 1990,1 he had suffered an injury to his knee that arose out of and in the course of his employment with USX.

After an ore tenus proceeding, the trial court entered a judgment in favor of USX, finding that Walter O’Dazier had not “sustain[ed] his burden of proof to entitle him to recovery under the Workmen’s…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Ex Parte Eastwood Foods, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1991
  2. Ex Parte VeazeySupreme Court of Alabama · 1993
  3. Ex Parte ValdezSupreme Court of Alabama · 1994
  4. Patterson v. Clarke County Motors, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1989
  5. Ex Parte HarrisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1991

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. King Power Equipment, Inc. v. RobinsonCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2000
  2. ATI Alldyne v. WiseheartCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API