Hercules Inc. v. Minnesota State Highway Department
District Court, D. Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
NEVILLE, District Judge.
This lawsuit appears in several aspects to be one of first impression. It is brought under 35,U.S.C. § 271 et. seq. and 28 U.S.C. § 1400(b) for claimed infringement of a process patent owned by plaintiff. Jurisdiction is conferred on this court by 28 U.S.C. § 1338. It is alleged that the Minnesota State Highway Department in spraying its rights-of-way for weed and pesticide control, is using a process that infringes plaintiff’s patent. No individual state officials or employees are made defendants. Defendant Dow Chemical Company manufactures, and through its…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Malloy v. HoganSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Hans v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Griffin v. School Bd. of Prince Edward Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1964
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Woelffer v. Happy States of America, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1985
- Lemelson v. Ampex CorporationDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1974
- College Savings Bank, and United States v. Florida Prepaid Postsecondary Education Expense BoardCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 95,677 Maxine Green, for Herself and for and on Behalf of All Other Persons Similarly Situated v. The State of UtahCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1976
- Applera Corp. v. MJ Research, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2004
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.