Legal Opinion
Seipold v. Gibbud
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided January 6, 1930PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMaltbie, J.
The defendant Slade owned a piece of land with an unfinished dwelling thereon. He made a verbal contract for the sale of the premises to the defendant Mrs. Gibbud. By the terms of the agreement she was to enter into possession of the land and buildings and complete the house and when it was completed the defendant Slade was to deliver title to her and to receive payment of the purchase price, $17,000. Mrs. Gibbud did enter into possession and made a contract with the defendant Laden to complete the building, the contract containing no provision as to when the agreed price was to be paid.…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Henderson v. ConnellyIllinois Supreme Court · 1887
- Downer v. ChesebroughSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1869
- Bohn Manufacturing Co. v. KountzeNebraska Supreme Court · 1890
- Fisk's Appeal From Doings of CommissionersSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1908
- Harmonie Club, Inc. v. SmirnowSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1927
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- McCutcheon & Burr, Inc. v. BermanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- Anderson v. SchiefferConnecticut Appellate Court · 1994
- Gavin v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1945
- Centerbrook, Architects & Planners v. Laurel Nursing Services, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- Joseph v. DonovanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1933
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.