Legal Opinion
Harriss v. Pan American World Airways, Inc.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided September 2, 1977No. C-74-1884-WWSPublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION ON THE ISSUES OF LIABILITY
SCHWARZER, District Judge.
This action was brought by plaintiffs Ute Harriss and Margaret Feather on their own behalf and on behalf of other female flight attendants in the employ of defendant Pan American World Airways, Inc. [Pan Am]. Plaintiffs charge Pan Am with violations of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, specifically Sections 703(a)(1), (2) of that Title, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-2(a)(l), (2). They allege that Pan Am has committed unlawful employment practices by: (1) requiring its female flight attendants to begin unpaid maternity…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Griggs v. Duke Power Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Washington v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Albemarle Paper Co. v. MoodySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Reed v. ReedSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Boynton Cab Co. v. Department of Industry, Labor & Human RelationsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
- Vuyanich v. Republic Nat. Bank of DallasDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 1980
- Criswell v. Western Airlines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- Catherine M. BURWELL Et Al., Appellees, v. EASTERN AIR LINES, INC., AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1980
- Harriss v. Pan American World Airways, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.