Bull v. Stichman
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtWilliams, J.
The defendants have moved' to dismiss the complaint and amended complaint on the grounds that the plaintiff has no legal capacity to sue and that neither the complaint nor the amended complaint state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action-.
Paragraph first of said amended complaint is as follows: “ That plaintiff is a citizen of the State of New York; paying state and county taxes on real estate which he owns in the Town of Hamburg, where he resides; and also paying state income taxes.”
The amended complaint attacks an allocation of the New York State Emergency Housing Joint Board in…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Schieffelin v. Valentine KomfortNew York Court of Appeals · 1914
- Matter of GudenNew York Court of Appeals · 1902
- Matter of Kuhn v. CurranNew York Court of Appeals · 1945
- Bull v. StichmanNew York Supreme Court · 1947
3Cited by5 opinions
- Bull v. StichmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1948
- Rose v. City of New RochelleNew York Supreme Court · 1953
- G. T. McGovern Trucking Co. v. MosesNew York Supreme Court · 1949
- Central Westchester Humane Society, Inc. v. HilleboeNew York Supreme Court · 1952
- Rosenbloom v. Town of PittsfordNew York Supreme Court · 1959