Legal Opinion

Grange Insurance v. Great American Insurance

Washington Supreme Court

Decided February 23, 1978No. 44631PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHorowitz, J.

This declaratory judgment action was brought to determine which of two insurance companies, if either, is obligated to provide uninsured motorist coverage (UMC) to an injured City of Tacoma policeman.

Two issues are presented. The first is whether the preparation and publication of bid specifications for Tacoma's liability insurance policy without a provision for UMC constituted a valid rejection of UMC within the meaning of RCW 48.22.030, the uninsured motorist coverage statute. Upon that question depends the liability of appellant Great American Insurance Company (Great American), which…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Abate v. Pioneer Mutual Casualty Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Touchette v. Northwestern Mutual InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Aldcroft v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1969
  4. Federated American Insurance v. RaynesWashington Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Cammel v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1975

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Mutual of Enumclaw Insurance v. WiscombWashington Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Britton v. Safeco Insurance Co. of AmericaWashington Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Finney v. Farmers Insurance Co. of WashingtonWashington Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Millers Casualty Insurance Co. of Texas v. BriggsWashington Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Thompson v. GRANGE INSURANCECourt of Appeals of Washington · 1983

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API