Legal Opinion

Grout v. Stewart

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided November 17, 1905No. Nos. 14,518—(52)PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal by defendant from an order of the district court for Winona county, Snow, J., denying a motion for a new trial, after a trial and findings in favor of plaintiff.

1Opinion of the CourtLewis, J.

Action for the specific enforcement of an oral contract to hold a conveyance of real estate as security for money loaned.

The complaint sets forth the following facts: Mrs. Thiers was the ■owner of one hundred sixty acres of. land, and October 4, 1898, her "husband joining, executed a contract for a deed to Spaulding. October 6, 1898, Spaulding and wife made a contract for deed of fifty acres •of this land to the mother and the wife of the plaintiff, and received from plaintiff $800, which amount Spaulding paid to Thiers to apply ■on his contract. In February, 1902, Spaulding defaulted on his…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Berkey v. JuddSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1875
  2. King v. McCarthySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1892
  3. Stitt v. Rat Portage Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1905
  4. Fisk v. StewartSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1877
  5. Irvine v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1883

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Bennett v. HarrisonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1911
  2. Pooley v. DuttonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1914
  3. Hatlestad v. Mutual Trust Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1936
  4. Mechtle v. ToppNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1952
  5. Henslin v. WingenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1938

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API