Bennett v. Harrison
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Application to the district court for St. Louis county by Russell M. Bennett, Edmund J. Longyear and William TL Daniels to register title to certain land. George L. Chesebrough and William Harrison served separate answers in which each alleged they became respectively equitable owners in fee simple of an undivided interest in the land described. The case was tried before Dibell, J., who made amended findings as stated in the opinion.
Read the full summary
Application to the district court for St. Louis county by Russell M. Bennett, Edmund J. Longyear and William TL Daniels to register title to certain land. George L. Chesebrough and William Harrison served separate answers in which each alleged they became respectively equitable owners in fee simple of an undivided interest in the land described. The case was tried before Dibell, J., who made amended findings as stated in the opinion. Erom an order denying the motion of applicants to vacate and set aside the decision and grant a new trial, they appealed.
1Opinion of the Court
Simpson, L.
This is an application to register title to lot 5, township 58 north, range 15 west. After issue joined and trial, the court, by amended findings and decree, determined that Russell M. Bennett was the ■owner of an undivided seven-eighteenths of lot 5, Edmund J. Long-year of an undivided seven-eighteenths, and William H. Daniels of an undivided four-eighteenths, subject to certain mining leases and .agreements for the payment of royalties; and, further:
“That the interest of said Russell M. Bennett and Edmund J. Longyear in the two-thirds (§) of the fee of said lands, acquired by the…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Glass v. HulbertMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1869
- Campbell v. DearbornMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1872
- Howland v. BlakeSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Levy v. . BrushNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
- Dunphy v. RyanSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Davis v. DavisWyoming Supreme Court · 1993
- Hammel v. FeighSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1919
- Redland v. RedlandWyoming Supreme Court · 2012
- Crosby v. Estate of StrahanWyoming Supreme Court · 1958
- Friedsam v. RoseCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1925
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.