Legal Opinion

Marandino v. Lawyers Title Insurance

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided June 18, 1931PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPrentis, C. J.

Katherine Marandino seeks to recover of the Lawyers Title Insurance Corporation under a policy which undertook to guarantee the title to certain real estate.

The issues were submitted to the trial judge, who entered judgment in favor of the defendant company, from which judgment this writ of error was allowed.

The conceded facts are that, in consideration of the premium paid, Katherine Marandino received a policy which states: “That for value received and only for the purposes set forth in the title certificate hereto attached and hereby made a part hereof, being identified herewith by the name…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Moran v. . Standard Oil Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1914
  2. Foehrenbach v. German-American Title & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1907
  3. Glyn v. Title Guarantee & Trust Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1909
  4. Broadway Realty Co. v. Lawyers Title Insurance & Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1919
  5. Pennsylvania Laundry Co. v. Land Title & Trust Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1920

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. First National Bank & Trust Co. v. New York Title InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1939
  2. New York Life Ins. Co. v. BennionCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1946
  3. Lagomarsino v. San Jose Abstract & Title InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
  4. Coast Mutual Building-Loan Ass'n v. Security Title Insurance & Guarantee Co.California Court of Appeal · 1936
  5. U. S. Life Title Insurance v. HutsellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1982

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API