Marchant v. Hughlett
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Two appeals in one record from the Baltimore City Court (Elliott, J.). The facts of the case are stated in the opinion of the Court.
Read the full summary
Two appeals in one record from the Baltimore City Court (Elliott, J.). The facts of the case are stated in the opinion of the Court. The following are the defendants’ prayers, including those that are referred to in the opinion of the Court: DefendcMits' First Prayer. — The defendants pray the Court to instruct itself sitting as a jury, that there is no evidence in this case legally sufficient to show that the defendants are liable upon the promissory note sued upon, under the terms of the agreement offered in evidence and entered into between plaintiff and defendants on the twelfth day of…
1Opinion of the CourtUrner, J.
This suit was brought by the plaintiff, as payee, against the defendants, as endorsers before delivery, of a promissory note made by the S. M. Johnson & Son Goal Company, a body corporate, for the sum of $3,500.00, dated June 17, 1907, and payable one year after date, with interest at six per cent. At the trial it was proven that the note was given in renewal of a pre-existing one for $4,000.00 in pursuance of the terms of an agreement in writing executed on June 12, 1906, by the corporation just mentioned and by the defendants, Addison E. Mullikin and Poland P. Marchanit, and their…
2Cited by4 opinions
- Roth v. Baltimore Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1931
- Ess-Arr Knitting Mills, Inc. v. FischerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1918
- Auburn Shale Brick Co. v. Cowan Building Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1915
- Hoke v. MehringCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1937