Legal Opinion

Auburn Shale Brick Co. v. Cowan Building Co.

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided February 10, 1915PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from the Court of Common Pleas of Baltimore City. (Dobles, J.) The facts are stated in the opinion of the Court.

1Opinion of the CourtBriscoe, J.

At the conclusion of the testimony, on both sides in this ease, the Court below granted at the instance of the defendant the following prayer: The defendant prays the Court to instruct the jury that under the pleadings and evidence in this case the plaintiff cannot recover and their verdict must be for the defendant.

The questions for our consideration are presented in the case upon a single exception, and that is to the action of the Court in granting the defendant’s prayer, withdrawing the case from the jury and directing a verdict for the defendant.

By a stipulation of counsel, filed herein…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Thomas Roberts & Co. v. BonaparteCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1890
  2. Sumwalt Ice & Coal Co. v. Knickerbocker Ice Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1911
  3. Newbold v. J. M. Bradstreet & SonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1881
  4. Kerr v. UrieCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1897
  5. Central Railway Co. v. BrewerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1894

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Rent-A-Car Co. v. Globe & Rutgers Fire InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1931
  2. Rosenbloom v. FeilerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1981
  3. Schloegel v. SykesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API