Legal Opinion

Ess-Arr Knitting Mills, Inc. v. Fischer

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided January 15, 1918PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeal from the Baltimore City Court. (Hetjisler I.) The facts are stated in the opinion of the Court.

1Opinion of the CourtConstable, J.

The case out of which- this appeal arose was a non-resident attachment, filed by the appellee, who conducted an establishment for the dyeing' of yarns. The appellant was a manufacturer of sweaters and bought large quantities of yarns in the undyed state, and later had them dyed in various colors to suit its trade.

The short note contained the six money counts, and showed . that $1,628.10 was claimed to be due from the defendant to the plaintiff for dyeing 9,000 pounds of yarn. The defendant dissolved the attachment by the filing of a bond, and filed the general issue pleas, together with a…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Merriam v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  2. Reed v. Insurance Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1877
  3. Southern Street Railway Advertising Co. v. Metropole Shoe Manufacturing Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1900
  4. Knabe v. BowlesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1914
  5. Marchant v. HughlettCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1912

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Virginian Export Coal Co. v. Rowland Land Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1926
  2. City of Montpelier v. National Surety Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1923
  3. William Danzer & Co. v. Western Maryland Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1933
  4. Mattingly Lumber Co. v. Equitable Building & Savings Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1939
  5. Lambdin v. DantzebeckerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1935

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API