Legal Opinion
Cockrum v. Donald J. Trump for President, Inc.
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided July 3, 2018No. Civil Action No. 2017-1370Published
1Opinion of the Court
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ROY COCKRUM; SCOTT COMER; and ERIC SCHOENBERG, Plaintiffs, Civil Action No. 17-1370 (ESH) v. DONALD J. TRUMP FOR PRESIDENT, INC.; and ROGER STONE, Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION Before the Court are defendants’ motions to dismiss and plaintiffs’ motion for jurisdictional discovery. Plaintiffs are two Democratic National Committee (“DNC”) donors (Cockrum and Schoenberg) and a former DNC employee (Comer). Defendants are Donald J. Trump for President, Inc. (“the Trump Campaign”), and Roger Stone, who was employed by the Trump Campaign…
2Cases cited69 opinions
- Daimler AG v. BaumanSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
- Goodyear Dunlop Tires Operations, S. A. v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Walden v. FioreSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
- Atlantic Marine Constr. Co. v. United States Dist. Court for Western Dist. of Tex.Supreme Court of the United States · 2013
- Ruhrgas Ag v. Marathon Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999
64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.