Legal Opinion
Maryland Casualty Co. v. Witherspoon
District Court, C.D. California
Decided January 22, 2014No. CV 13-07847-RSWL-SSAPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
AMENDED ORDER RE: DEFENDANT WITHERSPOON’S MOTION TO DISMISS OR STAY ACTION [13] AND DEFENDANT MARKETING ADVANTAGES’S MOTION FOR JOINDER IN MOTION TO DISMISS OR STAY ACTION [19]
RONALD S.W. LEW, Senior District Judge.
Currently before the Court are Defendant Reese Witherspoon’s (“Defendant Witherspoon”) Motion to Dismiss or Stay Action [13] and Defendant Marketing Advantages International, Inc.’s (“Defendant Marketing Advantages”) Motion for Join-der in Motion to Dismiss or Stay Action [19]. The Court, having reviewed all papers submitted pertaining to these Motions, NOW FINDS AND RULES AS…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Wilton v. Seven Falls Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Brillhart v. Excess Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. National Securities, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Montrose Chemical Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
- 98 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 291, 98 Daily Journal D.A.R. 398 Government Employees Insurance Company v. Alexander Dizol, Special Administrator of the Estate of Kevin Tate Dizol, DeceasedCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Erik Natkin, DO and Dr. Erik Natkin, DO PC, a Utah Corporation v. Benjamin NatkinDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2026
- Prime Insurance Company v. Turismo Express, Inc., et al.District Court, E.D. California · 2026