Legal Opinion
Ceci Bros. v. Five Twenty-One Corp.
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided February 16, 1999No. AC 17426PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
LAVERY, J.
The defendants appeal from the trial court’s denial of their application to discharge a mechanic’s lien placed on certain of their real property in Greenwich by the plaintiff, Ceci Brothers, Inc. On appeal, the defendants claim that the trial court improperly denied their application to discharge the mechanic’s lien because the services performed by the plaintiff were not lienable under General Statutes § 49-33.1 We agree with the defendants and, therefore, reverse the *775trial court’s decision denying the application to discharge.
The following pertinent facts are necessary to a…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Davis v. City of NorwichSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- Henry F. Raab Connecticut, Inc. v. J. W. Fisher Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
- H & S TORRINGTON ASSOCIATES v. Lutz Engineering Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
- Camputaro v. Stuart Hardwood Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Thompson & Peck, Inc. v. Division Drywall, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Dilieto v. County Obstetrics & Gynecology Group, P.C.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
- Ceci Bros. v. Five Twenty-One Corp.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2004
- State v. VinesConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
- Santa Fuel, Inc. v. VargaConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
- Weber v. Pascarella Mason Street, LLCConnecticut Appellate Court · 2007
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.