Legal Opinion

Hazel Cobb v. Pete Gilmer

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided July 11, 1966No. 19845PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BAZELON, Chief Judge:

This case involves the title to certain property located in the District of Columbia which was deeded to the original parties in this suit, Naomi Zachary and Pete Gilmer, as tenants by the entirety. In 1962 the parties, who had participated in a marriage ceremony in 1947, discovered that Naomi Zachary had never been legally divorced from her former husband Roy Zachary. Naomi Zachary subsequently instituted the present suit seeking judgment quieting title to the property in her name. Prior to trial she died, and her daughter, who was substituted as plaintiff, thereupon…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Coleman v. JacksonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1960
  2. Sheridan v. LuceySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
  3. Minnehan v. MinnehanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1958
  4. Nichols v. DandoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
  5. Arthur v. ArthurNebraska Supreme Court · 1927

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. In Re Wall.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1971
  2. Carter v. CarterDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1986
  3. Pennsylvania Bank & Trust Co. v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
  4. Heintz v. HudkinsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1992
  5. Burkholder Ex Rel. Burkholder v. BurkholderSupreme Court of Missouri · 2001

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API