Legal Opinion
Witjaksono v. Holder
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided July 23, 2009No. 19-4117PublishedCited by 42 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
This matter is before the court on Respondent’s Motion for Technical Correction of Decision. The motion is GRANTED. Footnote 2 on page 4 of the opinion is amended to read as follows:
Because Ligiowati does not advance an independent ground for withholding of removal, we do not consider her claim separately from Witjaksono’s petition.
In addition, the sentence appearing on page 9 of the opinion, reading “Nor is this circuit a stranger to the problem of DHS producing inadequate records,” is amended to read as follows, “Nor is this circuit a stranger to the problem of inadequate records of…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Kamla Prasad Meena Kumari Prasad Catherine Sandhya Prasad Micky Sudesh Prasad Ricky Sumit Prasad v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- Maryam Hartooni v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- Vera KORABLINA, Petitioner, v. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, RespondentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- Sidabutar v. GonzalesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
- Elzour v. AshcroftCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2004
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- Ritonga v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011
- Dallakoti v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2010
- Karki v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2013
- Galeano-Romero v. BarrCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2020
- Ting Xue v. LynchCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2016
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.