Legal Opinion

United States Rubber Co. v. I. T. S. Rubber Co.

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided January 2, 1923No. 3132PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LINDLEY, District Judge.

Appellant, defendant below, appeals from a decree finding that appellant has infringed upon reissue letters patent issued to John G. Tufford, assignor of appellee, plaintiff below, on January 11, 1916/ for improvements in resilient heels, No. 14,049, particularly as to claims Nos. 5 to 9 thereof, both inclusive. The so-called, heel involved is a “lift” of rubber, suitable for attachment to a leather heel or part heel of a shoe. The appellant has marketed, subsequent to its prior litigation with appellee, hereafter mentioned, a rubber lift for similar use, and has…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Fetzer & Spies Leather Co. v. I. T. S. Rubber Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1919
  2. Tee Pee Rubber Co. v. I. T. S. Rubber Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1920
  3. United States Rubber Co. v. I. T. S. Rubber Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1919
  4. Hill Rubber Heel Co. v. I. T. S. Rubber Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1920

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. I. T. S. Rubber Co. v. Essex Rubber Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. Peoples Gas Light & Coke Co. v. SlatteryIllinois Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Hartford-Empire Co. v. OBEARNESTER GLASS CO.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1938
  4. I. T. S. Co. v. Tee Pee Rubber Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1923
  5. I. T. S. Rubber Co. v. MalakoffDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API