Legal Opinion

United States Rubber Co. v. I. T. S. Rubber Co.

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided October 7, 1919No. 3296PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Eastern Division of the Northern District of Ohio; D. C. Westenhaver, Judge. Suit in equity by the I. T. S. Rubber Company against the United States Rubber Company. From an order granting a preliminary injunction, defendant appeals.

1Per curiam

This is an appeal from a preliminary injunction upon the same patent involved in the case decided herewith. Fetzer & Spies Co. v. I. T. S. Rubber Co. (No. 3268) 260 Fed. 939, —- C. C. A. -. All that is there said, and in the opinion of the District Court there adopted, with reference to the validity of the patent, we adopt for this case also. As to the points raised in this case, and not in that, a summarized statement of conclusions must suffice.

1. It is said that the substance of the additional claims secured by reissue was asked for and refused in the original application, and hence that…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Grand Rapids Show Case Co. v. BakerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1914
  2. Fetzer & Spies Leather Co. v. I. T. S. Rubber Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1919

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. I. T. S. Rubber Co. v. Essex Rubber Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. Fetzer & Spies Leather Co. v. I. T. S. Rubber Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1919
  3. I. T. S. Rubber Co. v. Essex Rubber Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1920
  4. Tee Pee Rubber Co. v. I. T. S. Rubber Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1920
  5. Elyria Nat. Rubber Heel Co. v. I. T. S. Rubber Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1920

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API