Legal Opinion

Norment v. Hobby

District Court, N.D. Alabama

Decided September 18, 1953No. Civ. 7195PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LYNNE, Chief Judge.

This cause came on to be heard on defendant’s motion for summary judgment, and is an action under section 205(g) of the Social Security Act, as amended (hereinafter referred to as the Act), 42 U.S.C.A. § 405(g), which provides for judicial review of a “final decision” of the Federal Security Administrator (now Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare) \

On July 30, 1952, plaintiff filed with the Bureau of Old-Age and Survivors Insurance of the Social Security Administration an application for old-age insurance benefits, alleging that she performed domestic services as an…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Walker v. AltmeyerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1943
  2. United States v. LaLoneCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1945
  3. United Gas Pipe Line Co. v. Federal Power Commission. Michigan Consolidated Gas Co. v. Federal Power CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1950
  4. Deptartment of Industrial Relations v. TomlinsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1948
  5. Social Security Board v. WarrenCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1944

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Jacobson v. FolsomDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1957
  2. Thurston v. HobbyDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1955
  3. Fuller v. FolsomDistrict Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1957
  4. Langford v. FlemmingCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1960
  5. Irvin v. HobbyDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1955

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API