Legal Opinion

State v. Mims

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided October 23, 1963Published

1Opinion of the Court

235 Or. 540 (1963)

385 P.2d 1002

STATE OF OREGON

v.

MIMS

Supreme Court of Oregon.

Argued July 3, 1963.

Reargued September 30, 1963.

Affirmed October 23, 1963.

Hattie Bratzel Kremen, District Attorney, Salem, and Gary D. Gortmaker, Deputy District Attorney, argued the cause and filed briefs for appellant.

Reginald S. Williams, Salem, and Elliott B. Cummins, McMinnville, argued the cause for respondent. On the brief were Osterman & Williams, Salem, and Cummins & Devlin, McMinnville.

Before McALLISTER, Chief Justice, and ROSSMAN, PERRY, O'CONNELL, GOODWIN, DENECKE and LUSK, Justices.

AFFIRMED.

LUSK, J.

The…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. State v. SmithOregon Supreme Court · 1948
  2. State v. HammelsyOregon Supreme Court · 1908
  3. State v. BurkeOregon Supreme Court · 1928
  4. State v. RussellOregon Supreme Court · 1962
  5. Littell v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1893

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API