Bidwell v. L.A. & San Diego Beach Ry.
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. Leovy & Leovy, George J. Leovy, and Thomas M. Leovy, for Appellant.
1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.
The appeals of the defendant are from the judgment and from an order denying a new trial.
The action was to recover damages alleged to have been caused to plaintiff by the negligence of the defendant. The complaint alleges that the plaintiff was driving his automobile along India Street in San Diego, at the intersection of that street with C Street, that the defendant was operating a railroad upon a track laid along C Street and crossing said intersection, that while plaintiff was crossing the said car line in his automobile, the defendant ran a motor car backward on said car line without…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Zibbell v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1911
- Scott v. San Bernardino Valley Traction Co.California Supreme Court · 1908
- Green v. Los Angeles Terminal Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1904
- Hamlin v. Pacific Electric Ry. Co.California Supreme Court · 1907
- Traver v. Spokane Street Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1901
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Rush v. LagomarsinoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
- Linde v. EmmickCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
- People v. SmithAppellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 1949
- Carey v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.California Court of Appeal · 1925
- Dawson v. San Diego Electric Railway Co.California Court of Appeal · 1927
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.