Legal Opinion
Burr v. Lichtenheim
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided June 14, 1983No. 11080PublishedCited by 52 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPeters, J.
This is a suit to recover damages for breach of an indemnity agreement. The plaintiff, John Burr, brought an action against the defendants Alexander Lichtenheim and Katherine Lichtenheim (the Lichtenheims) for tortious interference with a contract and for abuse of process and against the defendants Paul R. Daddona, Anthony M. Daddona and Biase Daddona (the Daddonas) for breach of an indemnity contract. The various counts against the two groups of defendants were tried separately. On the Lichtenheim counts, the trial court on one count and a jury on the other found the issues for the…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Turner v. ScanlonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1959
- Gordon v. Indusco Management Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1973
- Jones v. Strom Construction Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1974
- Montgomery Ward & Co. v. WetzelAppellate Court of Illinois · 1981
- Vallejos v. C. E. Glass Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1978
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by52 opinions
- Weiss v. WiederlightSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Beverly Hills Concepts, Inc. v. Schatz & Schatz, Ribicoff & KotkinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
- Sir Speedy, Inc. v. L & P Graphics, Inc., Neil H. Blatte and Business Service Centers, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
- Gargano v. HeymanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- West Haven Sound Development Corp. v. City of West HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.