Legal Opinion
General Motors Corp. v. Dohmann
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided December 22, 1998No. SC 15935PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
CALLAHAN, C. J.
The sole issue in this appeal is whether the Connecticut “lemon law,” General Statutes §§ 42-179 through 42-186,1 requires the plaintiff, General Motors Corporation, to provide the defendant, Eugene Dohmann, with a replacement vehicle.
The arbitration panel to which the matter had been referred subsequent to the defendant having instituted an arbitration proceeding pursuant to General Statutes § 42-181 reasonably could have found the following facts. On October 26, 1996, the defendant purchased a new Chevrolet S-10 pickup truck (truck) from Maritime Motors (Maritime),2 a…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Web Press Services Corp. v. New London Motors, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Connecticut Light & Power Co. v. Department of Public Utility ControlSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- Chmielewski v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- Conte v. Dwan Lincoln-Mercury, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1976
- State v. SpearsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Commission on Human Rights & Opportunities v. Sullivan AssociatesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
- Cotto v. United Technologies Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
- Genetti v. Catterpillar, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2001
- Velez v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
- Driscoll v. General Nutrition Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.