Legal Opinion
Breneisen v. Motorola, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided September 2, 2011No. 10-1982PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BAUER, Circuit Judge.
The plaintiffs appeal adverse decisions below relating to their one-time employer Motorola’s alleged violation of their rights under the proscriptive anti-discrimination and anti-retaliation provisions of § 2615 of the Family and Medical Leave Act (the “FMLA”). James Breneisen appeals the district court’s dismissal of his claim based on a determination that he was not eligible for recovery of lost back pay, lost employment benefits, and front pay from Motorola. Anna Lineweaver appeals the district court’s dismissal of her claim after Motorola tendered $3,840.00 to her, a…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Buckhannon Board & Care Home, Inc. v. West Virginia Dept. of Health and Human ResourcesSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Lewis v. Continental Bank Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Gale Edgar v. Jac Products, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
- Walker v. United Parcel Service, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2001
- Breneisen v. Motorola, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Damasco v. Clearwire Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011
- Common v. City of ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011
- Cindy Barrett v. Illinois Department of CorrectCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2015
- Kansas City Southern Railway Co. v. Sny Island Levee Drainage DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2016
- Hernandez v. Bridgestone Americas Tire Operations, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2016
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.