Liberty Bank v. Shimokawa
Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT BY
HAYASHI, C.J.
Liberty Bank appeals from the lower court’s decision invalidating the continuing guaranty given it by Appellee Asae Shomokawa and releasing her from liability on a promissory note executed after the execution of the guaranty.
The underlying issues which merit consideration are (1) whether the continuing guaranty as executed by appellee is a valid, enforceable contract of guaranty between the appellee and the bank and (2) whether there was adequate consideration given for subsequent loans made by the appellant-bank to the husband.
For the reasons stated…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Markell v. Sidney B. Pfeifer Foundation, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1980
- Squires v. WoodburyCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1980
- Hayes v. Travelers Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1937
- United States of America, Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. Ben T. Lowell and Louise D. Lowell, Appellants-Cross-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1977
- Eac Credit Corporation v. E. L. King, Jess Porter and Joyce PorterCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Associated Catalog Merchandisers, Inc. v. ChagnonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- Consolidated Roofing & Supply Co. v. GrimmCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1984
- Honolulu Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. MurphyHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1988
- Hawaii Leasing v. KleinHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1985
- Marriott Intern., Inc. v. deCELLESupreme Court of Alabama · 1998
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.