Marriott Intern., Inc. v. deCELLE
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
This case concerns whether a signatory to a guaranty contract is liable in his individual capacity. When the creditor sued to collect on the guaranty from the signatory in his individual capacity, the trial court granted the signatory's motion to dismiss. Because the contract as a whole is ambiguous as to whether the parties intended the signatory to be liable in his individual capacity, we reverse and remand.
I
From the record, the facts appear as follows: Sum Big Stores, Inc., was indebted to Marriott International, Inc. ("Marriott"). Marriott had Gregory deCelle, the president of Sum Big…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Goldman v. BeldenCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
- Clark v. Albertville Nursing Home, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1989
- Smith v. PottsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1974
- Lutz v. Van Heynigen Brokerage Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1917
- Carter v. Calhoun County Bd. of Ed.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1977
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Ex Parte CTB, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2000
- Parsons v. AaronSupreme Court of Alabama · 2002
- Cain v. SaundersCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2001
- SouthTrust Bank N.A. v. Jackson (In Re Dur Jac Ltd.)United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Alabama · 2000
- Birmingham Steel Erectors v. HaynesCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2001
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.