Legal Opinion

Hawaii Leasing v. Klein

Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals

Decided March 14, 1985No. 9810; CIVIL NO. 51176PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT BY

TANAKA, J.

In an action based on a contract of guaranty, defendants Leroy Klein (Klein) and B.A. Yorkshire (Yorkshire) (collectively Defendants) appeal from the judgment in favor of Hawaii Leasing (Plaintiff), a registered Hawaii limited partnership. We affirm the judgment except we set aside the award of costs and attorney’s fees.

The dispositive issues on appeal and our answers are:

1. Whether the trial court erred in not finding that Plaintiff breached its obligation to Defendants under the contract of guaranty and in not concluding that Defendants were thereby…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Jenkins v. WiseHawaii Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Waugh v. University of HawaiiHawaii Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Sharp v. Hui Wahine, Inc.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Yorita v. OkumotoHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1982
  5. Kim Ex Rel. Sur v. StateHawaii Supreme Court · 1980

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Best Place, Inc. v. Penn America Insurance Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Simmons v. PuuHawaii Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Joy A. McElroy, M.D., Inc. v. Maryl Group, Inc.Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 2005
  4. CIM Ins. Corp. v. Midpac Auto Center, Inc.District Court, D. Hawaii · 2000
  5. Bank of Hawaii v. Davis Radio Sales & Service, Inc.Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1986

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API