Legal Opinion

Anderson v. United States

United States Court of International Trade

Decided May 7, 1992No. Court 90-11-00617PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RESTANI, Judge:

Pursuant to Rule 56.1 of the Rules of the United States Court of International Trade, plaintiff requests judgment upon the administrative record regarding revocation of his customs broker’s license. Plaintiff’s license was revoked by order of the Assistant Secretary of Treasury, acting on behalf of the Secretary of the Treasury (the “Secretary”). This revocation was based upon the Secretary’s determination as recommended by an Administrative Law Judge (“AU”), that plaintiff violated several regulations and a statute pertaining to the conduct of customshouse brokers.

The…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. Ramon P. Johnson v. United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
  4. James L. Calhoun v. Benjamin F. Bailar, Postmaster General of the United States, DefendantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
  5. Schaefer v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1980

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. New Dynamics Foundation v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
  2. Pietrofeso v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1992
  3. Urbano v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1997
  4. Boynton v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2007
  5. Aspects Furniture Int'l, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2023

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API